Home > Articles about Justice O'Connor > O’Connor gives views on teen-age abortions

O’Connor gives views on teen-age abortions

September 12, 1981

ITEM DETAILS

Type: Newspaper article
Author: Associated Press
Source: Chandler Arizonan
Collection: The Kauffman-Henry Collection
Date is approximate: No

DISCLAIMER: This text has been transcribed automatically and may contain substantial inaccuracies due to the limitations of automatic transcription technology. This transcript is intended only to make the content of this document more easily discoverable and searchable. If you would like to quote the exact text of this document in any piece of work or research, please view the original using the link above and gather your quote directly from the source. The Sandra Day O'Connor Institute does not warrant, represent, or guarantee in any way that the text below is accurate.

WASHINGTON (AP) – Supreme Court nominee Sandra Day O’Connor, completing three days of confirmation hearings, declined to endorse the idea teen-agers should be denied abortions unless they have a parent’s permission. However, she told the Senate Judiciary Committee Friday she believes teen-agers should voluntarily consult with their parents before having abortions. Mrs. O’Connor’s refusal to call for mandatory parental consent for abortions or receipt of birth control information came during a final exchange with her principal adversary on the committee, Sen. Jeremiah Denton, R-Ala. In most cases, the Supreme Court has ruled that states may not require doctors to obtain the consent of a teen-ager’s parents before performing a requested abortion. In answer to questions about abortions for teen-agers, Mrs. O’Connor said, “It i~ my personal view that I would want the child to consult the parents .” Conservatives on the committee pursued Mrs. O’Connor to the end on her specific views on abortion without getting the kind of answers they really wanted. She made it clear on several occasions that she personally opposes abortion, but gave_no hint as to how she might vote on the explosive issue as a Supreme Court justice. The 51-year-old Arizona appeals court judge apologized for not being more specific on abortion and a variety of other issues but politely and repeatedly said that to do so might prejudice rulings she might make . After using an extra half hour in an attempt to pin down

© COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This Media Coverage / Article constitutes copyrighted material. The excerpt above is provided here for research purposes only under the terms of fair use (17 U.S.C. § 107). To view the complete original, please retrieve it from its original source noted above.