Home > Articles about Justice O'Connor > High Court nominee tells Senate panel that she personally opposes abortion

High Court nominee tells Senate panel that she personally opposes abortion

September 10, 1981

ITEM DETAILS

Type: Newspaper article
Source: The Wall Street Journal
Collection: The Kauffman-Henry Collection
Date is approximate: No

DISCLAIMER: This text has been transcribed automatically and may contain substantial inaccuracies due to the limitations of automatic transcription technology. This transcript is intended only to make the content of this document more easily discoverable and searchable. If you would like to quote the exact text of this document in any piece of work or research, please view the original using the link above and gather your quote directly from the source. The Sandra Day O'Connor Institute does not warrant, represent, or guarantee in any way that the text below is accurate.

WASHINGTON-Judge Sandra O’Connor began what seems certain to be a smooth sail toward Senate confirmation as the first woman Justice on the Supreme Court. I~ the first of three scheduled days of hearmgs before the Senate Judiciary Com mittee, Mrs. O’Connor maintained that she personally opposes abortion and strongly re spects the family. . The 51-year-old Arizona appeals court Judge cautiously fielded questions about her iudicial Philosop~y: She lar.i:elv avoided controversy, often givmg a rote recitation of her understanding of current law without expressing her views of the law. Asked early on in the hearings about her stand on abortion, Judge O’Connor said she opposes it “as a matter of birth control or otherwise.” . • Respect for Famllies In her own opening statement, she went out of her way to show her respect for the importance of families and family life. / Reading a portion of a standard marriage ~erem?ny she has used as a judge, she said: Marriage is far more than an exchange of vows .. It is the foundation of the family, it’s mankmd’s basic unit of society, it’s the hope of the world and the strength of our coun try.” She then introduced her husband John, a Phoenix lawyer, and her three sons.’ Her comments on abortion and on the f~ilf apparently were aimed at blunting cntJc1sm of her record on abortion by rightto-life groups that charge that she was in fa vor of abortion during four years as an Ari zona state senator. A handful of anti•abor tion demonstrators picketed

© COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This Media Coverage / Article constitutes copyrighted material. The excerpt above is provided here for research purposes only under the terms of fair use (17 U.S.C. § 107). To view the complete original, please retrieve it from its original source noted above.