As the first female Supreme Court Justice and the first female state majority leader, Justice O’Connor’s story has inspired many journalists, authors, cartoonists, and groups to celebrate her experience. This catalog explores the media coverage she received throughout her career.
The nomination of Arizona Appeals Court Justice Sandra D. O’Connor for the vacant U.S. Supreme Court seat drew an almost universal reaction from Michigan jurists, feminists and lawyers Tuesday: applause for President Reagan’s selection of a woman candidate and bewilderment about the candidate herself. Even Cornella Kennedy, the U.S. Court of Appeals judge who was widely regarded as a leading choice for the nomination, said she knew only what she had read in press accounts about O’Connor. Kennedy said she was pleased a woman had been nominated. She added, “I would have been more pleased if it were I.” John Felkens, chief judge of the U.S. District Court iri Michigan’s eastern district, . said he was pleased Reagan Cornfha Kennedy had chosen a woman “but terribly disappointed that it is not my friend Cornella Kennedy.” And former Michigan Republican senator Robert Griffin, who said he had lobbied for Kennedy in Washington “to the extent I could,” praised Reagan for fulfilling his campaign promise by nominating a woman. “Of course,” he said from his Washington office, “I was hoping the choice would be Cornelia Kennedy or (Michigan Supreme Court Chief Justice) Mary Coleman.” LOCAL WOMEN judges and lawyers praised Reagan’s choice of a woman. “I am very pleased to think I will look upon that
WASHINGTON (AP) President Reagan today chose Arizona Judge Sandra D. O’Connor to become the first woman justice in the history of the Supreme Court, calling her “truly a person for all seasons,” and fulfilling a promise he made on the way to the White House. Reagan said he did not name a woman to succeed retiring Justice Potter Stewart “merely to do so,” but because Mrs. O’Connor has the qualities needed on the high court. “She is truly a person for all seasons, possessing tpose unique qualities of temperament, fairness, intellectual capacity and devotion to the public good which had characterized the 101 bretheren who have preceded her,” the president said in his nationally broadcast and televised announcement. “I commend you to her, and I urge the Senate’s swift bipartisan confirmation, so that as soon as possible she may take her seat on the court and her place in history,” Reagan said. Then, at her own news conference in Phoenix, the 51- year-old Mrs. O’Connor pledged to “simply try to do as good a job as I think I can .” She said Reagan had interviewed her last week for 15 minutes and called her at 4 p.m. Monday to tell her of her selection. “This is a momentous day in my life, in the life of my family,” the beaming nominee declared. “I can’t believe it, I still can’t believe it,” Mrs. O’Connor said as she slipped out of the jammed appeals court room in which her news conference was held. Poised but looking a bit weary, Mrs. O’Connor answered only routine questions during
By naming Arizona Judge Sandra O’Connor to the U.S. Supreme Court, President Reagan nominated a first-rate justice who will add to the court more than a profound theoretical knowledge of the law. A judge of the Arizona Court of Appeals, Mrs. O’Connor is a respected legal scholar. During a distinguished political and legal career in Arizona, however, she also has demonstrated a deep sensitivity to the practical aspects of law. She is no ivory tower theorist who regards the law as the exclusive realm of a special priesthood of attorneys, something apart from the ordinary people who must live by that law. She developed that outlook not only through a logic generated by a superior intellect but also because she has been so much a part of the lawmaking process and so involved in community affairs. She is the first and only woman to hold a high leadership position in the Legislature, selected as Senate majority leader in 1973, not out of any zeal on the part of her colleagues to set an example for equal opportunity but rather because her constant pursuit of excellence earned the admiration of other senators. Because Justice-select O’Connor happens to be a woman, President Reagan gets credit for keeping a campaign promise and may gain some political leverage m the women’s movement. Be that as it may, the U.S. Supreme Court and the nation stand to benefit from the appointment.
Praise for Judge Sandra Day O’Connor’s keen analytical mind and legal ability came today from her friends at Stanford University, where she received her L.L.B. in 1952, and from Keith Sorenson, San Mateo County district attorney, who was her first boss. “She’s got a steel-trap mind, she’s ‘cool hand Luke’ and never gets rattled,” said Dean Charles Meyers of the Stanford Law School. “Whenever she spoke, we all listened,” said William Kimball, chairman of the Stanford Board of Trustees . “She is a super person. O’Connor. 51, nominated today to become the first woman justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, was a Stanford trustee from 1976 to 1980. She graduated number three in the Stanford law class that was headed academically by current Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist. O’Connor was among the friends invited by Rehnquist to his swearing in ceremony after he was named to the Supreme Court. O’Connor worked during 1953 and 1954 for Sorenson while her husband, John, now a Phoenix lawyer, was completing his law degree at Stanford. Her duties consisted mainly of researching legal issues. Sorenson said today, “She was exceptionally bright, very quick at catching on to questions to be researched, and she analyzed the law very carefully. “I was very sorry to see her leave the office when she and her husband moved out of the state. I’ve kept track of her over the years through mutual friends, an Dean Meyers predicted less than three weeks ago that O’Connor would be seriously considered
WASHINGTON – Many people hailed President Reagan’s choice today of Arizona Judge Sandra O’Connor to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court, but anti-abortion leaders and the head of the Moral Majority vowed to fight the nomination. At a news conference in Phoenix O’Connor said Reagan telephoned her yesterday afternoon and told her she was his choice. But she repeatedly refused to discuss abortion, equal rights for women or any other “substantive questions pending the confirmation hearings.” A beaming O’Connor kissed her husband and three sons and told reporters who questioned her lack of federal judicial experience: “Time will tell whether I have a lot to learn.” Asked to describe her feelings on being the first women appointed she said: “I don’t know that I can. In approaching the work on the bench I will approach it with care and effort and do the best job I can do.” Former President Nixon called the nomination of O’Connor, who served as co-chairman of Arizona’s state committee to re-elect Nixon “a dramatic breakthrough for women, the court and the nation.” But the Rev. Jerry Falwell of Moral Majority condemned the selection, saying: “Either the president. did not have sufficient information about. Judge O’Connor’s background on social issues or he chose to ignore that information.” Her “record indicates she is not an opponent of abortion on demand and is opposed to attempts to curb this biological holocaust … ,” he said. The National Right to Life Committee, which voiced
SINCE her graduation from law school at the age of 22. Sandra Day O’Connor, nominated Tuesday to the U.S. Supreme Court, has made her mark both as a judge and as a Republican. politician in Arizona. Mrs. O’Connor, 51, is a judge on the Arizona Court of Appeals. She was born in 1930, in El Paso, Tex., but she grew up on a cattle ranch in southern Arizona and claims that as her native state. She received a bachelor’s degree in economics with “great distinction” from Stanford University in 1950. She earned her law degree two y.ears later, also from Stanford and also with honors. She ranked third in her law class; the person who ranked No. 1 was fellow Westerner William Rehnquist, who has been on the Supreme Court since 19’62. Another classmate was Frank X. Gordon, now an Arizona Supreme Court justice. “SHE’S EXCEPTIONALLY well qualified, with a tremendous background in politics,1′ Gordon said after learning of her nomination. She was married to a classmate, John O’Connor, and remained in California while he finished law school. She worked for a time as an assistant district attorney in San Mateo County. She joined the Arizona bar in 1957, practiced briefly in Maryvale, Ariz., and was an assistant attorney general from 1965 to 1969. In 1969, she was appointed to the state senate and subsequently was elected to two terms as a Republican. She was elected majority leader, the first woman to win such a powerful state position. She received 75 per cent of the vote, more than any other
…
recognized she was not going to be acceptable to conservatives so they rushed this thing.” An associate of Falwell said, “The church people would desert him (Reagan) in droves .” “President Reagan’s nomination of Judge Sandra O’Connor of Arizona to the Supreme Court is a mistake.” Falwell said in a statement released by associate Cal Thomas. “Either the president did not have sufficient information about Judge O’Connor’s background in social issues or he chose to ignore that information.
“Judge O’Connor’s record indicates she is not an opponent of abortion on demand and is opposed to attempts to curb this biological holocaust that has taken the lives of more than 10 million innocent babies since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision by the Supreme Court” that legalized abortion. “Judge O’Connor also has been active in feminist causes and is a supporter of the Equal Rights Amendment, which Moral Majority believes would be a disaster for men and women and would further undermine the traditional family … ”
Nancy Kramer, executive director of the Committee for Public Justice, a New York-based affiliate of the American Civil Liberties Union, urged that O’Connor’s background be checked before Senate confirmation hearings begin. Kramer is also head of a project called “Supreme Court Watch” which the committee set up last January to compile dossiers on who were considered to be the likeliest nominees for the Supreme Court vacancy. The nomination of O’Connor, a 51-year-old former state
By PETER BROCK Herald-Post Staff Writer Copyright 1981 El Paso Herald-Post
RAILROAD DRAW, GREENLEE COUNTY, Ariz. – The quiet Lazy B ranchhouse suddenly erupted early today with a flurry of congratulatory phone calls to Harry and Ada Mae Day, who were trying to watch President Ronald Reagan nominate their daughter, Sandra Day O’Connor, as the 102nd Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Day, a retired 83-year-old rancher and Greenlee County native, beamed while watching Reagan call his daughter “a person for all seasons.”
“SHE SURE LOOKS LIKE HER father doesn’t she,” Day laughed proudly while watching television pictures of his daughter. “That’d be a shame if the Senate didn’t confirm her, wouldn’t it?” he joked with his wife, who dabbed tears from her eyes.
Day and his wife became slightly irritable as White House reporters badgered Attorney General William French Smith about Judge O’Connor’s position on abortion. “I basically know what it is,” he said, and then refused to explain his daughter’s abortion philosophy. “She’s so conscientious, though, she won’t even give me a legal opinion any more. As a judge, she can’t. So she refers me to her husband.”
“SHE’S A VERY THOUGHTFUL person. I’ve never known anyone who didn’t like her. She is a dear person, and she isn’t the type who would try to high-hat anybody,” said her mother. “She’s excelled in everything she’s done.”
“I don’t suppose it would be any use to try to call her now,” said Day, who added Judge O’Connor
… secretary, who was with the judge in Phoenix today. Saying she was “extremely happy and honored,” the judge promised in a statement from Phoenix this afternoon that, if confirmed, she would do her “best to serve the court and this nation in a manner that will bring credit to the president, to my family and to all people of this great nation.”
Attorney General William French Smith told reporters at the White House that the final decision was made yesterday. Reagan, who interviewed O’Connor personally July 1, said he would send a formal nomination to the Senate as soon as the FBI checks are completed. O’Connor would take the place of Justice Potter Stewart, who retired last Friday. She would make $88,700 a year and would take her seat for the first time publicly when the court starts a new term Oct. S. On the bench, she will sit next to a fellow Arizonan and a former law school classmate, Justice William H. Rehnquist.
Today, the judge was in her chambers in Phoenix, taking telephone calls and visiting with court aides according to White House aide Roussel. He said she was in her car going to the courthouse when Reagan appeared on TV this morning to announce his choice. Earlier in the day, O’Connor “hardly got to eat her breakfast” – scrambled eggs and orange juice – because the telephone rang so often at her borne in Phoenix’s Paradise Valley section, Roussel reported. He said she did not know when she would come to Washington. The judge would not comment on any controversy
President Reagan ended two centuries of male exclusivity in the Supreme Court today by nominating Mrs Sandra O’Connor, a judge on the Arizona Court of Appeals, to succeed Justice Potter Stewart, who is retiring. If confirmed she will be the first appointment to the Supreme Court for six years. President Reagan announced her nomination in the White House press office, describing her as ” truly a person for all seasons, possessing those unique qualities of temperament: fairness, intellectual capacity and devotion to public good “. During last year’s election campaign, President Reagan said he would name a woman to the Supreme Court, but yesterday he emphasized he had chosen Mrs O’Connor mainly because she agreed with his judicial philosophy that it is the court’s duty to interpret the law and not to make it. Mrs O’Connor, who is 51, has enjoyed a meteoric rise through Arizona’s political and judicial circles . She served two full terms in the Arizona State Sen ate, where she became majority leader, the first woman in the United States to be elected to such a post. In 1975, she was elected a superior court judge in Phoenix, and was promoted to the Arizona Court of Appeals 18 months ago. Despite her conservative inclinations, she has supported feminists on abortion legislation and the equal rights amendment. The National Right to Life Committee has already announced that anti-abortionists will oppose her confirmation. Just ice Stewart, whom she will be replacing, often swung between
U.S. Sen. Barry Goldwater found out Arizona Appeals Court Judge Sandra O’Connor had been chosen for the U.S. Supreme Court when President Reagan called the senator’s airborne plane this morning. “I think the president has taken a great step,” Goldwater later told his Washington staff which also contacted the senator during his Washington to El Paso flight. “The president could find literally hundreds of qualified women attorneys and jurists in this country, but I douf>t that he could ever find one more qualified to occupy a seat on the United States Supreme Court than Sandra O’Connor, whom I have known for years and greatly respect and admire,” the senator said. Goldwater, R-Ariz., met Monday night with Reagan to again urge the appointment and had been one of Judge O’Connor’s earliest endorsers for the appointment. Goldwater’s support today set the pace for other Arizonans when they heard the news. Gov. Bruce Babbitt, who appointed Judge O’Connor to the appeals court, said, “I am confident that Sandra O’Connor will distinguish herself as a member of the Supreme Court. President Reagan is to be congratulated for making an outstanding selection.” The governor noted, “After I became governor, I appointed Sandra to fill the first vacany that came open on the Court of Appeals. Her abiliities were so obvious that I actively sought her out to serve on the court. That was the only time I have done that.” “Her judicial temperment, knowledge of the law and her willingness to work long
WASHINGTON – The Moral Majority and the nation’s largest anti-abortion organization said today they would seek to block Senate confirmation of Arizona Court Of Appeals Judge Sandra D. O’Connor as a Supreme Court justice because of her views on abortion. “Sandra O’Connor had a consistent and strong pro-abortion voting record while a senator in Arizona,” said Dr. J.C. Wilkie, president of the National Right -to-Life Committee. President Reagan, in announcing Mrs. O’Connor’s nomination, said he was completely satisfied with her record on right-to-life issues. He did not elaborate. WILKIE AND Richard Viguerie, publisher of the Conservative Digest, spoke bitterly of Reagan’s choice, charging that the president had ignored the pledge of the Republican 1980 platform to name judges “who respect traditional family values and the sanctity of innocent human life.” Douglas Badger, a lobbyist for the Christian Action Council, a Protestant group that opposes abortion, explained the opposition to Mrs. O’Connor by citing three votes which he said she cast in the Arizona Senate. Badger said that in 1970 – before the Supreme Court ‘s 1973 abortion decision – she voted for a bill that would have legalized abortions in Arizona under certain circumstances. He was unable to detail those circumstances. THEN IN 197 4, he said, she voted in the Senate Judiciary Committee and in the Republican caucus against a resolution calling on Congress to amend the Constitution to outlaw abortions. Also in 1974,
It didn’t taken Sandra O’Connor long to make a good Impression on her colleagues. In the 18 months she sat on the , Arizona Court of Appeals, she won the respect of her male colleagues, who , showered her with praise when her , name was mentioned as a possible Supreme Court nominee. “She has a razor-sharp mind which, combined with a steady temperament , makes her well-suited for the tough questions that would be presented to a U.S. Supreme Court justice,” said Appeals Court Judge Donald Froeb. President Reagan today broke two centuries of male exclusivity by naming Mrs. O’Connor to replace retiring Justice Potter Stewart. Mrs. O’Connor, 51, is a former Republican state legislator and superior court judge. She was appointed to the state appeals court in December, 1979. A leader in Arizona GOP politics, she was co-chair of the state commit – tee to re-elect Richard Nixon in 1972. “From a judicial standpoint, I personally like her conservative approach to resolving issues before us,” said Appeals Court Judge Laurence T. Wren. But despite that conservative tag, her record in the Arizona legislative reflected a more liberal stand on women’s issues. In 1974, she sponsored a bill to present the Equal Rights Amendments to an advisory referendum. However, that proposal died in committee. Also that year, she was among nine senators who opposed a bill that would have forbidden abortions at the University Hospital in Tucson, Ariz., unless the mother’s life was endangered . She first was
“I didn ‘t believe it, I just didn’t believe it,” Arizona Court of Appeals Judge Sandra D. O’Connor said today after President Reagan nominated her as the first woman justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. The president had called her Monday afternoon, informing her of his decision, she said during a morning press conference. “This is a momentous day in my life and that of my family. I am extremely happy and honored to have been nominated,” she told reporters. “IF CONFIRMED, I will do my best t.o serve the court and this nation in a manner that will bring credit to the president, to my family and to all the people of this great nation.” Mrs. O’Connor, 51, considered a moderate-conservative, declined to answer issue-oriented questions from the press until her U.S. Senate confirmation hearings. According to Reagan aide Peter Roussel, no date has been set for those hearings. In announcing his choice for the high court vacancy created by the retirement of Justice Potter Stewart, Reagan noted the speculation that was raised concerning the appointment of a woman. “I MADE A commitment that one of my first appointments would be the most qualified woman I could possibly find,” Reagan told reporters at a hastily-called news conference at 8 a.m. Phoenix time to answer specific issue questions, but that didn’t deter reporters from asking politically sensitive questions. MRS. O’CONNOR, described by associates as a moderate-conservative, refused to categorize herself on the political spectrum.
PHOENIX – Arizona Appeals Court Judge Sandra D. O’Connor shook her head and told a r~rter, “I didn’t believe It, I didn’t believe it’ as she left a quickly called press confere(lce two hours after she was nominated to become the first female justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Minutes before, she told reporters who had gathered in her appeals courtroom here, “If confirmed, I will do my best to serve the court and this nation in a manner that will bring credit to the president, to my family and to all the people of this great nation.” Dressed in a lightweight blue suit, the blonde-haired, 51-year-old jurist refused to respond to questions touching on the abortion controversy that has already started swirling around her nomination. She said, “l can’t address myself to any substantive questions pending my confirmation hearings.” Her husband, John Jay O’Connor III (himself a practicing attorney), and her three sons, Scott, Brian and Jay, flanked the prospective Supreme Court justice In the crowded courtroom. Asked what she and President Reagan had discussed during a !~minute interview in the White House late last week, Judge O’Connor said, “I’m not at liberty to disclose that conversation. Check with the White House.” Meanwhile, the leader of the the pro-life forces in the Arizona Legislature, Scottsdale Republican James Skelly, said he was “sick” about Judge O’Connor’s nomination. “It has nothing to do with her legal qualifications. No one can argue with the fact that she’s a brilliant
Judge Sandra D. O’Connor, President Reagan ‘s choice for the Supreme Court, was graduated from Stanford University Law School in 1952, with the Order of the Coif. Among her law school classmates was Supreme Court Just ice William H. Rehnquist. She was a member of the board of editors of the Stanford Law Review and was on the Stanford Board of Trustees from 1976-80. She married another classmate, John Jay O’Connor III, now a Phoenix lawyer. They have three sons. Born in Duncan, Ariz., to a ranching family, she was a politician before her appointment to the Arizona bench, becoming majority leader of the Senate in 1973- the first and only woman to hold the job in either house of the state Legislature. “She was a super floor leader for lots of reasons, ” said Republican William Jacquin , president of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and president of the Senate when O’Connor was majority leader .
President Reagan today broke with two centuries of American history and named a woman, Arizona Court of Appeals Judge Sandra D. O’Connor, to become a justice of the United States Supreme Court. O’Connor, 51, is a conservative Republican who Reagan said “is truly a person for all seasons.” “I commend her to you, and I urge swift bipartisan confirmation by the Senate,” Reagan said. The president made the announcement in an appearance in the White House press room. Attorney General William French Smith told reporters that the decision on the O’Connor nomination was made yesterday. Reagan, who interviewed O’Connor personally on July 1, said he would send a formal nomination to the Senate as soon as the FBI checks are completed . O’Connor, if confirmed, would take the place of retiring Justice Potter Stewart, who announced on June 18 that he was stepping down. She would make $88,700 and take her seat when the court convenes for its next term in October. Her name was the only one submitted to the White House by Sen. Barry Goldwater, R-Ariz., who four years ago urged her to leave the bench to run for governor. Both Goldwater and Senate Judiciary Committee member Dennis DeConcini, D-Ariz., as well as former House Republican Minority Leader John J. Rhodes, R-Ariz., had urged her appointment to the court. But the White House had come under extreme pressure in recent days from anti-abortion groups to drop O’Connor as a,potential nominee. Since Friday, scores of letters and telegrams had
WASHINGTON (UPI) – President Reagan said today he plans to nominate Arizona Judge Sandra O’Connor – “a person for all seasons” – to become the first woman to serve on the Supreme Court. Reagan’s historic selection would end a 191-year, male-only tradition on the nation’s highest court if Mrs. O’Connor, 51, is approved by the Senate to replace Justice Potter Stewart, who retired last week. JUDGE O’Conor is “truly a person for all seasons, possessing those unique qualities of temperament, fairness, intellectual capacity and devotion to the public good,” the president said, making the announcement in the White House press briefing room. “I am extremely happy and honored to have been nominated,” Mrs. O’Connor said in a statement. “If confirmed, I will do my best to serve the court and this nation in a manner that will bring credit to the president, to lfi1 ~ n’ir.i BflJ !”ll the people of this great nation.” At a news conference in Phoenix, Mrs. O’Connor said Reagan telephoned her Monday afternoon and told her she was his choice. She repeatedly refused to discuss abortion, equal rights for women or any other “substantive questions pending the confirmation hearings.” MRS. O’CONNOR, beaming happily, kissed her husband and three sons and told reporters who questioned her lack of federal judicial experience: “Time will tell whether I have a lot to learn.” Asked to describe her feelings on being the first women appointed, she said: “I don’t know that I can. In approaching the work on
WASHINGTON (AP) – President Reagan today named Arizona judge Sandra D. O’Connor to become the first woman justice in the 191 years of the Supreme Court. Mrs. O’Connor, 51, who Reagan called “a person for all seasons,” would fill the vacancy created by Justice Potter Stewart’s retirement. And her selection as the court’s 102nd justice, following 101 “Brethren,” matches the president’s campaign pledge to name a woman to one of the first vacancies. Reagan called it “the most awesome appointment” within his power. In Phoenix, Mrs. O’Connor told a news conference that “This is a momentous day in my life and the life of my family. I am extremely happy and honored to have been nominated by President Reagan for a position on the U.S. Supreme Court.” “If confirmed, I will do my best to serve the court and this nation in a manner that will brmg credit to the president, to my family and to all the people of this great nation,” she said . The president announced his choice on a nationwide broadcast from the White House press room . He had decided upon Mrs. O’Connor following apersonal interview with her last week in the Oval Office and a followup telephone call late Monday . Reagan urged the Senate to give “swift bi-partisan confirmation” to her “so that, as soon as possible, she may take her seat on the court and her place in history.” The court, now in recess, does not begin its 1981-82 term until October. Some opposition already was brewing among the far right to her prospective nomination,
“Excitement is the only word that explains how I feel,” said Mrs. John Kipp, of El Paso, cousin of Judge Sandra Day O’Connor. Judge O’Connor, . a native of El Paso, was recommended today for the U.S. Supreme Court vacancy by President Ronald Reagan. “IT’S WONDERFUL and I am so happy for Sandra,” Mrs. Kipp said. “It’s a Mrs. John Kipp milestone in history!” Mrs. Kipp and her father, Scott Wilkie, president of PB&S Inc., El Paso, have been tuned anxiously to the news for the past week. Judge O’Connor was born here, attended Radford School for Girls and was graduated from Austin High School. “I haven’t seen Sandra in some time,” Mrs. Kipp said. “She and her husband do quite a bit of traveling. They both took up skiing when he was stationed in Germany as a member of the Judge Advocate General’s Corps. They go to various ski areas during the winter – Colorado California, Utah. ‘ “They also like to get up early in the morning and play tennis. “The O’Connors have three sons: Scott Hampton (named after my father), Brian, a student at Colorado College in Colorado and John Jay who is entering Stanford this fall. Scott is 23 and was graduated from Stanford last year with a degree in business administration. John Jay is involved in sky diving and I think Brian is too.” IN SPITE OF Judge O’Connor’s enjoyment of skiing, tennis and riding horseback, Mrs. Kipp said the judge really isn’t athletically inclined. “She likes water coloring,” Mrs. Kipp said. “I was closer to her sister, Mrs. Scott
WASHINGTON-Breaking two centuries of male exclusivity on the Supreme Court, President Reagan disclosed Tuesday that he will nominate Sandra D. O’Connor for the high court . Mrs. O’Connor, 51, a judge on the Arizona Court of Appeals, was named to fill the vacancy created by the retirement of Justice Potter Stewart.
Reagan made the precedent-setting announcement Tuesday morning in the ‘ White House briefing room. The President described Mrs. O’Connor as “truly a person for all seasons, possessing those unique qualities of temperament, fairness. intellectual capacity, and devotion to the public good.”
IN PHOENIX, Judge O’Connor called the nomination a “momentous” day in her life and the life of her family, and said she was “extremely happy.” “If I am confirmed in the United States Senate,”she said, “I will do my best to serve the court and this nation in a manner that will bring credit to the President, to my family, and to all.the people of this great nation.” In making the nomination, Reagan kept a campaign pledge to appoint a woman to one of the first vacancies on the Supreme Court. At the time, Reagan had been under fire from women’s organizations for his opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment. REAGAN INTERVIEWED Mrs. O’Connor last Wednesday in the Oval Office. According to administration officials, Reagan was highly impressed and put her at the top of his short list of potential nominees. The President reportedly made the decision on Monday. Mrs. O’Connor is a moderate
WASHINGTON (UPI) – Sexism dies hard in some places in Washington. A longtime official of the Senate, which has only two women members – the most it has ever had at one time – walked by the United Press International news wire and learned of the nomination of Sandra .O’Connor, 51, as Supreme Court justice. The old-time Democrat, a high-ranking member of the sergeant-at-arms staff who did not wish to be quoted by name, said, “I see he nominated a woman … the O’Connor girl.”-
Court Barber Draws the line John Shaw is the last remnant of the Supreme Court’s 191-year history as a male• only institution. Shaw is the court’s barber. There is no beauty parlor and no beautician. But, asked today if he could cut future Justice Sandra O’Connor’s hair, he replied, “Yes, sir.” If she wants her hair done more elaborately, however, she will have to go elsewhere. “I don’t do permanents,” Shaw said. The most important indicator of maleness at the court was put to an end at 3 p.m. last Nov 14. That is when the court decided, after a secret discussion, to drop all refer• ences in opinions and other official orders to “Mr. Justice.” The public first became aware of the change on the following Monday, when the court issued an opinion in the case of Dennis v. Sparks, writ• ten by “Justice White.” The change reportedly was adopted in anticipation that, someday, a woman would be joining the brethren. Although the court has a gymnasium, it has not been segregated by sex. Women employers of the court have been having an exercise class there, and they have access to the showers. The bathrooms in the individual justices’ chambers are configured for unisex use. – Lyle Denniston
The President. Ladies and gentlemen, I have a statement to make. And then following that statement, if there are any questions you might have, I shall refer you to the Attorney General.
As President of the United States, I have the honor and the privilege to pick thousands of appointees for positions in Federal Government. Each is important and deserves a great deal of care for each individual called upon make his or her contribution, often at personal sacrifice, to shaping the policy of the Nation. Thus each has an obligation to you, in varying degrees, has an impact on your life.
In addition, as President, I have the privilege to make a certain number of nominations which have a more lasting influence on our lives, for they are the lifetime appointments of those men and women called upon to serve in the judiciary in our Federal district courts and courts of appeals. These individuals dispense justice and provide for us these most cherished guarantees of protections of our criminal and civil laws. But, without doubt, the most awesome appointment is a guarantee to us of so many things, because it is a President — as a President, I can make an appointment to the United States Supreme Court.
Those who sit in the Supreme Court interpret the laws of our land and truly do leave their footprints on the sands of time. Long after the policies of Presidents and Senators and Congressmen of any given era may have passed from public memory, they’ll be remembered.
WASHINGTON (AP) – Restraint and clear writing are the key traits of the decisions written by Judge Sandra D. O’Connor, but they give little indication of her stance on the major issues now being waged In the federal courts. Mrs. O’Connor, a judge on the Arizona Court of Appeals, was nominated by President Reagan today to become the first woman on the Supreme Court, following the retirement last week of Justice Potter Stewart. In criminal matters, Mrs. O’Connor, 51, generally has ruled against defendants’ claims, deferring to the rulings of trial court judges. An analysis of 14 of her opinions shows no cases Involving any of the major issues that are bound to come up during her Senate confirmation hearings: abortion, women’s rights, homosexual rights and the rights of the accused. – That may be explained in part by the fact that the highest courts in many states tend to hear the most important disputes, while the simpler disputes are relegated to lower-level appeals courts. The Arizona Court of Appeals is the lower-level appellate court in that state. “The power of a court to render a valid judgment is limited by the nature of the suit, and the issues raised in the pleadings. If the court’s judgment exceeds those limits, it is void,” Judge O’Connor wrote in May 1980 overturning a trial court money award In a dispute ov~r support payments in a divorce. Of the 14 opinions reviewed, only two appeared to break new ground. In one the court in September 1980 struck down as unconstitutional
PHOENIX, Ariz. – ‘Arizona Appeals Court Judge Sandra D. O’Connor, President Reagan’s nominee to the Supre,me Court, has a long background in the law and politics, and she rates superlatives from her colle-c1gues in both arenas. O’Connor’s abilities foster respect from people in both major political parties. Attorneys, legislators and others praised her nomination to fill the vacancy created by retirement of Justice Potter Stewart. Dean Roger C. Henderson of the University of Arizona Law School called the nomination an “excellent appointment.” “She is a no-nonsense person,” he said. “When she gets down to business. it’s all busines.<;. •She will call them as she sees them, that's for sure. She's Just going to be great." Bob Begam, a Phoenix attorney, said he was .. surprised and delighted. 1 would say she is a conservative person but that she will approach each issue on its merit which is what any judge, particularly a Supreme Court judge, should do. "She won't fall into any pattern. Some of her opinions may be embraced by conservatives, others embraced by liberals. She will, in my opinion, decide each case on its merits." Despite her conservative bent. she has supported abortion legJSlation and the Equal Rights Amendment. The president of the National Right to Life Committee immediately announced "the entire pro-life movement will oppose her confirmation." O'Connor. 51, was graduated from Stanford University Law School in 1952, with the Order of the Coif. She was a member of
WASHINGTON, July 1 – Sandra D. O’Connor, a 51-year-old judge of the Arizona Court of Appeals, is a top contender to fill the Supreme Court vacancy, Reagan Administration sources said last night.
They confirmed that Judge O’Connor was on the so-calk!d “short list” of possible nominees by President Reagan to fill the vacancy caused by the retirement of Justice Potter Stewart and said that she was one of a very few persons who were interviewed by Administration officials in the past few days.
An administration official said today that the “short list” contained fewer than five names, winnowed by the Attorney General from an original “long list” of about 25 names. The official declined to say how many names on the “short list were women.
Judge O’Connor has been an active member of the Republican Party, and is described by party members as politically conservative. She was appointed to the Arizona Court of Appeals, the state’s second highest court, 18 months ago by Gov. Bruce Babbitt, a Democrat.
She earlier served two full terms in the Arizona State Senate and was elected majority leader before being elected a Superior Court Judge in Phoenix in 1975. In 1972 she was co-chairman of the Arizona state committee in behalf of President Nixon’s re-election.
A well-placed Administration source indicated last night that Judge O’Connor had emerged as one of the top candidates for the post.
There was no indication how many more potential nominees would be interviewed nor when the President
“Very flattering, but I’m not packing my bags,” said Judge Sandra Day O’Connor, Arizona Court of Appeals, about being considered for the U.S. Supreme Court vacancy. ” I don’t have the appointment and I still have a long way to go.” SHE TALKED TO the Herald-Post about her El Paso background today by phone from Phoenix, just before she and her husband left for the northern Arizona mountains on a vacation. “My parents are Harry and Ada Mae Day,” she said. “They live on the Lazy B Ranch in the New Mexico and Arizona area , where they’ve always lived. My folks have lived on the Lazy B since 1880. “When I went to El Paso to school, I lived with my grandmother, Mrs. W. W. Wilkey. I went to Radford School for Girls for many, many years and then to Austin High School for the last two years .” SHE WAS GRADUATED from Austin in 1946 and recalls her school days as very happy. She remembers some old schoolmates : “Cita Fletcher was one of my close friends,” she said. “I remember Sam Young Jr .. .. Rondy Hill … Paquita Schwartz.” My aunt Evelyn Wooten lived in El Paso, but she’s now in Houston. My uncle Scott Wilkey still lives in El Paso.
“My cousin, Flornoy Davis, married Sal Manzo, and they lived in El Paso after his retirement from the military. They now live in Houston. Another El Paso cousin is Mrs. John (Amanda) Kipp.” She visits El Paso on occasion, she said. MEANWHILE HER former classmates and friends were excited over the prospect of her appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The
Sandra D. O’Connor, a prominent Arizona jurist with Republican political ties, has emerged as a leading candidate for the Supreme Court vacancy that will be created tomorrow when Justice Potter Stewart retires. Administration officials confirmed that O’Connor had been interviewed for the job.
She is believed to be the only potential nominee interviewed so far, and she is one of a few candidates, most of them of women, whose name appears on a “short list” kept by top White House aides and Attorney General William French Smith. “She hasn’t been chosen yet, but she’s close,” said one source.
O’Connor, a judge of the Arizona Court of Appeals, has risen quickly through the state’s political and professional circles, impressing colleagues with her intellect, demeanor, organizational ability and conservative views.
The 51-year-old jurist was third in the Stanford law school class in which Justice William Rehnquist finished first. She received one of the highest ratings of any judge evaluated in a 1980 state bar poll — 90 percent favorable. In addition to her legal credentials, O’Connor has strong backing from Arizona’s senators — Barry Goldwater (R) and Dennis DeConcind (D), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee — and from former House Republican leader John Rhodes.
“She’s what the president’s looking for,” DeConcini said. “She believes in the court, interpreting the law, not making it.”
This was the criterion President Reagan laid down when he announced Stewart’s
WASHINGTON (AP) – Judge Sandra D. O’Connor of the Arizona Court of Appeals has emerged as a leading candidate to succeed Justice Potter Stewart on the U.S. Supreme Court, the Washington Post reported today. “She hasn’t been chosen yet. but she’s close,” the newspaper quoted one unnamed Reagan administration source as saying. The Post said Mrs. O’Connor, 51, was interviewed for the vacancy by an administration official and was believed to be the only potential nominee to be interviewed. In another development, the New York Daily News quoted Reagan administration sources in today’s editions as saying that U.S. District Judge Lawrence W. Pierce, a 56-year-old black. is also being considered for the high-court seat. Administration officials said Mrs. O’Connor is on a “short list” of leading candidates – most of them women – for Stewart’s seat, which becomes vacant when he retires Friday, according to The Post. During his campaign last year. President Reagan said he wanted to name a woman to one of the first vacancies on the nine-member court. The White House, however, has kept open the possibility that a man could be named to succeed Stewart. Until now, one of the women mentioned most often as Stewart’s likely successor has been Cornelia Kennedy of Detroit, a member of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The Post said Mrs. O’Connor has support from both of Arizona’s senators, Republican Barry Goldwater and Democrat Dennis DeConcini, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Arizona Judge Has Strong Credentials, Conservative Views
Arizona Woman Heading List For Supreme Court Vacancy
Sandra D. O’Connor, a prominent Arizona jurist with Republican political credentials, has emerged as a leading candidate for the Supreme Court vacancy that will be created Friday when Justice Potter Stewart retires. Well-placed administration officials confirmed that O’Connor, who received a high ranking from the Arizona Bar Association and was third in the Stanford law school class in which Justice William H Rehnquist finished first, had been interviewed for the job. She is believed to be the only potential nominee interviewed so far, and hers is one of a few names, most of them of women, on a “short list” reposing now with a handful of top White House aides and Attorney General William French Smith. “She hasn’t been chosen yet, but she’s close,” said one source. O’Connor, a 51-year-old judge of the Arizona Court of Appeals, has enjoyed a meteoric rise through the state’s political and professional circles, impressing colleagues with her intellect, demeanor, organizational abilities and conservative views. She received one of the highest ratings of any judge evaluated in a 1980 state bar poll – 90 percent favorable. In addition to her legal credentials, O’Connor has strong backing from Arizona’s senators, Barry Goldwater (R) and Dennis DeConcind (D), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and from former House Republican leader John J. Rhodes.
“She’s what
Sandra D. O’Connor, a 51-year-old judge of the Arizona Court of Appeals, has moved into position as a top contender to fill the Supreme court vacancy, administration sources said last night. They confirmed that Judge O’Connor was on the so-called “short list” of possible nominees by President Reagan to fill the vacancy caused by the retirement of Justice Potter Stewart and said that she was one of •a very few that had already been interviewed by the administration in the past few days. These sources declined to disclose how many names were on the “short list” and how many of those were women, but an original “long list” had about 25 possible candidates for the vacancy. Judge O’Connor wife of a Phoenix attorney, has been an active member ,of the Republican Party, and is described by party members as politi- ‘cally conservative. She served two ‘full terms in the Arizona state senate and was elected majority leader before being elected a county judge in that state in 1975I.n 1972s he was cochairman of the Arizona state committee in behalf of President Nixon’s re-election. While acknowledging that various prominent women have been mentioned for the vacancy in keeping with a campaign promise by Reagan that he would name a woman to the high court, a well-placed administration source indicated last night that Judge O’Connor was more than just one of those many names. She has emerged as one of the very leading candidates for the post, he said. There was no indication how many more potential
El Pasoan is court frontrunner
WASHINGTON (UPI) – Judge Sandra D. O’Connor of the Arizona Court of Appeals , a native El Pasoan, is on the short list of Potential nominees to fill the upcoming Supreme Court vacancy, it was learned today.
Administration sources said the choice would be made “very soon,” possibly next week, of a new Supreme Court justice for the opening that will occur Friday with the resignation of Justice Potter Stewart.
MRS. O’CONNOR WAS born in El Paso. Her parents had a ranch that crossed the New Mexico Arizona line in the area of Duncan, Ariz., and Lordsburg, N.M.
When it came time, Mrs. O’Connor’s mother traveled to El Paso to have the baby and stayed with Mrs. O’Connor’s grandmother, who lived in El Paso at the time.
David Gergen, White House director of communications, today ruled out any announcement of a new Supreme ‘ Court justice this weekend. He would not confirm that Judge O’Connor had been interviewed at the White House for the vacancy.
“I DON’T WANT TO speculate on names or the process” of selection, be said. “It’s not a fruitful exercise .”
The Washington Post, quoting well-placed administration officials, reported Ms. O’Connor has been interviewed for the high court opening and is being eyed as the frontrunner to fill the vacancy,
Aides to Sen. Barry Goldwater , R-Ariz., said today the senator immediately notified the White House about Judge O’Connor when Stewart announced his resignation.
“THE SENATOR HAS really pushed for her and
WASHINGTON( AP) – Judge Sandra D. O’Connor of the Arizona Court of Appeals is on a narrow list of candidates to succeed Justice Potter Stewart on the U.S. Supreme Court. It could not be learned how many other names were on the narrow list. But one administration official who declined to be named said that a decision by President Reagan on his choice was expected soon. This source said that Attorney General William French Smith had developed an initial list of 20 to 25 names from many more who had been suggested. One Justice Department source said the administration had been given the names of about 50 different people by various congressmen, lawyers, interest groups and others. The administration source said that the attorney general culled the names to 20 to 25 by reviewing the background of the individuals suggested, reading their opinions and writings and discussing them with acquaintances and colleagues. Smith and Reagan then narrowed the list and are well along in the selection process, this source said. Those who are under serious consideration have been interviewed or are about to be interviewed by the attorney general or other top Justice Department officials. In today’s editions, the Washington Post said Mrs. O’Connor has emerged as a leading candidate. “She hasn’t been chosen yet, but she’s close,” the newspaper quoted one unnamed Reagan administration source as saying. The Post said Mrs. O’Connor, 51, was interviewed for the vacancy by an administration official and
WASHINGTON (AP) – President Reagan is expected soon to announce his nominee to fill the first vacancy on the nine-member Supreme Court since 1975. The retirement of Associate Justice Potter Stewart was effective at the end of today and there are hints his successor could be named within a few days. Among those on a narrow list of candidates is Sandra D. O’Connor, an Arizona appeals court judge. She would be the first woman to serve on the court. Bill Jacquin, president of the Arizon Chamber of Commerce, said she was interviewed at the White House on Wednesday. The New York Times reported Saturday that Mrs. O’Connor is among “fewer than five” people in contention for the job. The Washington Star said others on the so-called short list include former Solicitor General Robert H. Bork, Judge J . Clifford Wallace of the 9th U.S. Circuit Cort of Appeals and Utah Supreme Court Justice Dallin Oaks. Here, at a glance, is the lineup of Supreme Court justices, listed according to the president who nominated them; giving dates of their birth, of Senate action on their nomination, and when they took office. Retiring Judge Potter Stewart: Born Jan . 23, 1915,i n Jackson, Mich., he was appointed during a Senate recess Oct. 14, 1958, taking office that day. He was then nominated by Presi• dent Eisenhower Jan. 17, 1959; confirmed by the Senate May 5, 1959; and again took the oath of office May 15, 1959. Stewart retired effective Friday in letter to Reagan dated May 18. Reagan accepted Stewart’s
President Reagan broke the all-male tradition of the Supreme Court on Tuesday, July 7, by nominating Arizona Court of Appeals Judge Sandra Day O’Connor to succeed retiring Justice Potter Stewart. Judge O’Connor, 51, becomes the first woman to be nominated to sit on the high court. President Reagan said of Judge O’Connor, “She is truly a person for all seasons, possessing those unique qualities of temperament, fairness, intellectual capacity and devotion to the public good which have characterized the 101 brethren who have preceded her. Judge O’Connor, in my view, will bring new luster and new strength to the Supreme Court. I feel certain that her term upon the bench will be one of the proudest legacies of my presidency.”
Judge O’Connor was appointed to the Arizona Court of Appeals eighteen months ago by Governor Bruce Babbitt. She was elected as a county judge in 1975 and has served as President of the Arizona State Senate. Commenting on the nomination, officials of the bar issued a statement that read, “The State Bar of Arizona is honored and extremely proud of the nomination by President Reagan of Judge Sandra O’Connor to be an associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Judge O’Connor is an outstanding member of the Arizona legal community, and we know that she will be an outstanding Supreme Court Justice as well.”
She was an accomplished trial court judge and has proven herself to be one of Arizona’s most able appellate court judges as evidenced by the high ratings
No sooner had U.S. Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart announced that he will retire next month than Sen. Dennis DeConcini was campaigning for Sandra O’Connor of the Arizona Court of Appeals as a worthy replacement.
DeConcini’s quick move made sense. For President Reagan has said he will move quickly to fill the vacancy, hoping the Senate can confirm his appointment before the high court reconvenes in October. The promotion of a qualified woman jurist also made sense, because Reagan has indicated the Supreme Court will seat its first female member during his administration. Actually, Democrat DeConcini, who seldom misses a political trick, stole the march on Sen. Barry Goldwater. It would seem that Republican Goldwater should have seized the opportunity to drop the name of Mrs. O’Connor, a conservative Republican and a near-neighbor from Paradise Valley. In any event, Tucsonian DeConcini, facing a statewide re-election race in 1982, no doubt endeared himself to many people in Maricopa County through his alertness. Mrs. O’Connor, 51, an appellate court judge since 1979, is highly regarded. We trust Reagan will give Mrs. O’Connor careful consideration. We were impressed by her five-year performance as a state senator (1969- 74), especially her final two years as a bright and effective Senate pres ident, and we have heard good reports of her even-handedness as a judge, beginning with her Maricopa County Superior Court stint (1974-79). As a clear sign of her popularity, Mrs. O’Connor
THERE have been 101 justices on the United States Supreme Court since it was formed nearly 200 years ago.
All men.
Now a woman may make it.
It’s high time.
During his campaign for the presidency, Ronald Reagan promised one of his first appointments to the highest court in the land would be a woman.
He will make his first appointment, to fill the forthcoming resignation of Justice Potter Stewart, before Oct. 1.
While Justice Stewart said that appointing a judge on the basis of sex “was antithetical to the very idea of what a judge is supposed to be,” being a female won’t hurt any candidate for the Supreme Court now.
Here are some who undoubtedly will be considered:
Anne Armstrong, of Texas, a Republican dynamo who has served as ambassador to Great Britain.
Carla Hills, a Republican lawyer from California who has served in the Cabinet. At one time President Reagan was considering her for solicitor general.
Cornelia Kennedy and Amalya Kerase, appellate federal judges in Michigan and New York. While available reference books do not give the political party affiliations of either, both are black.
The opportunity of breaking the female barrier with a black woman must have great attraction to any politically inclined president, which Reagan certainly is. But Justice Thurgood Marshall is black, and there might be political problems with having two black justices on a nine-member court. We suspect Kennedy and Kerase will have to wait until Justice Marshall leaves the court.
Arizona Appellate Court Judge Sandra O’Connor has been suggested as a possible candidate.
One of her main problems, of course, is that Arizona already has one Supreme Court Justice, William Rehnquist, and it would be unusual indeed for a small state to have two members of the court.
