Home > Articles about Justice O'Connor > In Senate hearing O’Connor defends abortion vote

In Senate hearing O’Connor defends abortion vote

September 9, 1982

ITEM DETAILS

Type: Newspaper article
Author: Associated Press
Source: Scottsdale Daily Progress
Collection: The Kauffman-Henry Collection
Date is approximate: No
defends_abortion_vote.jpg

DISCLAIMER: This text has been transcribed automatically and may contain substantial inaccuracies due to the limitations of automatic transcription technology. This transcript is intended only to make the content of this document more easily discoverable and searchable. If you would like to quote the exact text of this document in any piece of work or research, please view the original using the link above and gather your quote directly from the source. The Sandra Day O'Connor Institute does not warrant, represent, or guarantee in any way that the text below is accurate.

WASHINGTON (AP) – Supreme Court nominee Sandra Day O’Cormor said today she is opposed to abortion but that her personal views would not control her votes on the nation’s highest court. “My own view in the area of abortion is that I’m opposed to it,” O’Cormor told the Senate Judiciary Committee. But she emphasized her belief that judges should not let personal feelings dictate their decisions on constitutional issues. O’Connor, the first woman ever nominated to the Supreme Court, sought to explain and defend votes she cast while a member of the Arizona Senate from 1969 to 1975 which have been interpreted by political conservatives as “proabortion.” She portrayed those votes as not true reflections on abortion, itself, but on tangential legislative concerns. In response to other committee questions, O’Connor attempted to enhance her image as a judicial conservative. “I do well understand the difference between legislating and judging. . . . As a judge, it is not my function to develop social policy by means of making the law,” she said. O’Connor has been a state appeals court judge in Arizona since 1979, and was a state trial judge the previous four years. “I do not believe it is the function of the judiciary to step in and change the law because the times or social mores have changed,” she said. O’Connor promised the senators that, if confirmed as the 102nd member in the high court’s 191-year history, her job will be “one of interpreting and applying the law, not making it.” Keeping

© COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This Media Coverage / Article constitutes copyrighted material. The excerpt above is provided here for research purposes only under the terms of fair use (17 U.S.C. § 107). To view the complete original, please retrieve it from its original source noted above.