New Justice is low-keyed, relatively uncontroversial

She’s been called “extraordinary,” “outstanding,” “truly outstanding” and “the best thing since Girl Scout cookies.” Speechmakers in the Senate called her appointment “historic,” “truly historic,” “a landmark,” “monumental.” It is just possible that sometimes Sandra D. O’Connor may not recognize the woman she reads about and sees on television so often these days. That is because her history and her testimony during her confirmation hearings suggest that she has arrived where she is by being relatively uncontroversial, by being low-keyed, by appreciating the fine detail rather than the cosmic sweep, by keeping out of trouble, rather than by making trouble. Her achievements have been solid. But no one who knows them calls them brilliant or inspired. In that respect, she is no different than many other appointees to the U.S. Supreme Court. And if she follows the example of many of them, it may be that she will not be heard from in any dramatic way for some time. She may burrow into the marble palace for months or years before making a mark. Then again, she could begin in a burst of glory. But that would not be her way. The court, the late Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone once said, is “nine quiet old boys.” Make that eight quiet men and one probably very quiet woman. She appeared uncomfortable at the beginning. When she first came to town, she seemed visibly stunned, even a bit shaken, by all the attention she was getting. “I’ve never seen so many reporters, cameras, all in one