Home > Articles about Justice O'Connor > O’Connor and her spouse have $1.1 million assets

O’Connor and her spouse have $1.1 million assets

September 3, 1981

ITEM DETAILS

Type: Newspaper article
Author: Associated Press
Source: Mesa Tribune
Collection: The Kauffman-Henry Collection
Date is approximate: No

DISCLAIMER: This text has been transcribed automatically and may contain substantial inaccuracies due to the limitations of automatic transcription technology. This transcript is intended only to make the content of this document more easily discoverable and searchable. If you would like to quote the exact text of this document in any piece of work or research, please view the original using the link above and gather your quote directly from the source. The Sandra Day O'Connor Institute does not warrant, represent, or guarantee in any way that the text below is accurate.

WASHINGTON (AP) – Sandra O’Connor, in town a week early to prepare for Senate hearings on her nomination to the Supreme Court, has disclosed that she and her husband are worth more than $1 million. . In a written response to a Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire, O’Connor endorsed “neutral” enforcement of equal rights and said she is “keenly aware of the problems associated with ‘judicial activism.”‘ “The separation of powers principle also requires judges to avoid substituting their own views of what is desirable in a particular case for those of the legislature,” she wrote. “Judges are not only not authorized to engage in executive or legislative functions, they are also ill-equipped to do so. Serious difficulties arise when a judge undertakes to act as an administrator or supervisor in an area requiring expertise, and judges who purport to decide matters of public policy are certainly not as attuned to the public will as are the members of the politically accountable branches.” O’Connor’s view on equal rights is likely to gladden opponents of affirmative action. ”The essence of equal justice under the law, in my view, is that neutral laws be applied in a neutral fashion,” she wrote. She said she has worked for equal rights for women by seeking repeal of “a nwnber of outmoded Arizon~ statutes” including one that barred women from working more than eight hours a day. She said she also developed model legislation to allow women to manage property held jointly with their

© COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This Media Coverage / Article constitutes copyrighted material. The excerpt above is provided here for research purposes only under the terms of fair use (17 U.S.C. § 107). To view the complete original, please retrieve it from its original source noted above.