Home > Articles about Justice O'Connor > O’Connor Sees Lower Court Reform Needs. Justice Urges Action

O’Connor Sees Lower Court Reform Needs. Justice Urges Action

November 27, 1981

ITEM DETAILS

Type: Newspaper article
Author: Richard DeUriarte
Source: The Phoenix Gazette Metro News
Collection: The Kauffman-Henry Collection
Date is approximate: No
sees_reform_needs.jpg

DISCLAIMER: This text has been transcribed automatically and may contain substantial inaccuracies due to the limitations of automatic transcription technology. This transcript is intended only to make the content of this document more easily discoverable and searchable. If you would like to quote the exact text of this document in any piece of work or research, please view the original using the link above and gather your quote directly from the source. The Sandra Day O'Connor Institute does not warrant, represent, or guarantee in any way that the text below is accurate.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor said today the time has come for Arizona “to buckle down and achieve a thorough reform1 ‘ of its lower court system. “Arizona has studied this problem long enough,” Justice O’Connor told an audience of about 400 at a conference on “Arizona’s Pe()ples Courts: Proposals for Improvement,” at the Arizona State University College of Law. SHE SAID the current judicial system creates “overlapping jurisdiction, duplication, disparity in workloads and cash-register justice.” Justice O’Connor, an Arizona appeals court judge before being named by President Reagan to the Supreme Court, was introduced by ASU law professor Willard Pedrick as the “Jackie Robinson” of the high court. Quoting Thomas Jefferson, she said, “Laws and institutions must change to keep pace with changing times.” She traced the history of court reform proposals back to 1906 and outlined successful court unification schemes in Kentucxky, Connecticut and Wisconsin. According to Justice O’Connor, any reform of municipal and justice courts should include: • A mechanism to remove incompetent judges at the local level. • Central court management and administration. “We need to reassign judges, relieve congestion and provide for central recordkeeping,” she said. • State financing of local courts. “People tum to courts when all else fails,” Justice O’Connor told the group, which was dotted with state Supreme Court justices, lawmakers and ASU law students. “Unfortunately they also

© COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This Media Coverage / Article constitutes copyrighted material. The excerpt above is provided here for research purposes only under the terms of fair use (17 U.S.C. § 107). To view the complete original, please retrieve it from its original source noted above.