Home > Articles about Justice O'Connor > A Tribute to Justice Sandra Day O’Connor

A Tribute to Justice Sandra Day O’Connor

January 1, 1996

ITEM DETAILS

Type: Law review article
Author: M. Bernard Aidinoff
Source: Ann. Surv. Am. L. xiii
Citation: 1996 Ann. Surv. Am. L. xiii (1996)
Date is approximate: Yes
1996AnnSurvAmLxi__2_-nofirst.png

DISCLAIMER: This text has been transcribed automatically and may contain substantial inaccuracies due to the limitations of automatic transcription technology. This transcript is intended only to make the content of this document more easily discoverable and searchable. If you would like to quote the exact text of this document in any piece of work or research, please view the original using the link above and gather your quote directly from the source. The Sandra Day O'Connor Institute does not warrant, represent, or guarantee in any way that the text below is accurate.

A TRIBUTE TO

JUSTICE SANDRA DAY O’CONNOR

In July, 1981, President Reagan nominated Sandra Day O’Connor as a Justice of the United States Supreme Court. The nomination was greeted with enthusiasm by the press and the gen eral public. The applause generated was focused initially on the fact that she would be the first woman to serve on the Supreme Court. Outside of Arizona, her qualifications were not well-known and, even as a nominee, she was stereotyped as a Reagan conserva tive-whatever that might have meant. Her confirmation hearings, however, demonstrated not only that she was articulate and well prepared, but that this nominee had the intellectual strength and ability to make a substantial contribution to the Court. As Dean Alan A. Matheson of the Arizona State University School of Law stated at the time, “After the clamor concerning the first female appointee has receded, Justice Sandra [Day] O’Connor will be judged solely on the basis of her ability and her contribution to the development of the law. The judgment will be a positive one.”1

Justice O’Connor is now in her fifteenth term of service on the Court. The judgment is indeed a positive one.

I am not the appropriate person to comment on Justice O’Connor’s significant contributions to the work of the Court in the criminal justice and civil rights areas, or with respect to redis tricting, affirmative action, abortion, the federal-state relationship, the Establishment Clause, etc. And very few would be interested

© COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This Media Coverage / Article constitutes copyrighted material. The excerpt above is provided here for research purposes only under the terms of fair use (17 U.S.C. § 107). To view the complete original, please visit Lib.asu.edu