O’CONNOR, Presiding Judge. The issue presented in this Industrial Commission special action is whether the administrative law judge was correct […]

O’CONNOR, Judge. At issue in this appeal is the construction of A.R.S. s 33-1002(B) as it existed in 1976 and

O’CONNOR, Judge. This special action challenges the decision of the Industrial Commission administrative law judge1 dismissing a request for hearing

O’CONNOR, Presiding Judge. This is an appeal from a denial of a motion for new trial following a jury verdict

O’CONNOR, Judge. The question in this review of a decision of the unemployment insurance appeals board of the Arizona Department

O’CONNOR, Judge. This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of appellee. The sole issue is whether a

O’CONNOR, Judge. The issues involved in this appeal are whether a cause of action may be maintained by a party

O’CONNOR, Judge. Appellants, Paul J. Johnson and Anna M. Johnson, husband and wife, and Paul Johnson Jewelers, Inc., an Arizona

O’CONNOR, Presiding Judge. This special action is from a determination by the Industrial Commission closing petitioner’s industrial claim with a

O’CONNOR, Presiding Judge. The issue in this special action review of an Industrial Commission award is whether the administrative law