Panel discussion with Justice Elena Kagan on women in the legal profession at the Newseum
Sandra Day O’Connor This is a great program and it’s a topic that I’ve spent time thinking about over the years. Needless to say, My chambers window looks out on the Sewell Belmont house that used to be the home of Alice, all the famous suffragette. So I’m reminded when I look out my window of efforts, women may just get the right to vote, much less practice law, and most of the early women legal pioneers faced a profession and a society that espouse what we call the cult of domesticity. Women were different from men, they said and women were fitted for motherhood and home life. They were compassionate, selfless, gentle, moral and pure. And their minds were tuned to art and religion, not logic. Man, on the other hand, were fitted by nature for competition and intellectual discovery in the world. They were battle hardened, shrewd, authoritative and tough minded. Women were thought to be ill qualified for adversarial litigation, because it requires sharp logic and shrewd negotiation, not to mention exposure that an unjust and the immoral. Now in 1875, the Wisconsin Supreme Court told Lavinia Goodell she could not be admitted to the State Bar. That Chief Justice said the practice of law was unfit for the female character to expose women to the brutal, repulsive and obscene events of courtroom life. He said would shock man’s reverence for womanhood and relax the public sense of decency? Now, in a similar case, Myra Bradwell of Chicago who had studied law with her husband applied








